Fact-checking brief for sponsored content: Capture every checkable claim in exact wording; Match evidence to specific claims with date, scope and conditions; Return clear decisions: approve, narrow, request evidence or remove
Image: Native Advertising Desk

Sponsored Editorial

Part of Sponsored article production

Building a fact-checking brief for sponsored content

Build a claim-by-claim fact-checking brief with exact wording, evidence, dates, material conditions and a decision for the writer.

Build the fact-checking brief from the claims in the proposed article, not just the documents the sponsor supplies. Give the checker the exact wording, the evidence offered for it and any limit readers need to know. A folder of documents does not show which sentence each document supports.

Capture the claims readers will see

Read the draft headline, standfirst, body, captions, teaser and call to action. Record every checkable assertion and any material implication created by an image or comparison. A sponsor's opinion can be attributed as a perspective, but a measurable assertion within it still needs checking.

Use one row per claim:

Field / Record

Wording and location
The exact statement or presentation under review
Claim type
Product fact, price, availability, comparison, outcome or wider context
Evidence and owner
The source, who supplied it and who can explain it
Date and scope
The product version, Australian market, period or customer group covered
Material conditions
Exceptions or assumptions readers need beside the claim
Decision
Approve, narrow, request evidence or remove

Match evidence to wording

A current specification may support a feature description; it does not, by itself, show that the feature saves every customer time. A case study about one client needs wording that preserves that client's circumstances. For a comparison, record the alternatives, measure and period. For an outcome, ask how it was measured.

Check whether the offer is current and available to the audience named in the copy. Put a material plan, location or eligibility condition beside the claim it limits.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) says it can require businesses to back up claims they make about their products or services. Internal sign-off does not substitute for evidence that fits the published words.

Return a decision the writer can use

For each row, give approved wording where possible. If the evidence supports a narrower statement, write that statement. If support is inadequate, remove the claim and identify any headline, caption or section that depends on it. Keep unresolved rows visible rather than treating silence as approval.

When sponsor feedback or a product change alters an approved sentence, reopen its row and related promotional copy. The brief is ready for handover when each material claim in the proposed publication package can be traced to a decision and its stated limits.

More from Sponsored Editorial